Cardiovascular risk profiles in a lupus cohort: what do different calculators tell us?

نویسندگان

  • Daniel Boulos
  • Rachel L Koelmeyer
  • Eric F Morand
  • Alberta Y Hoi
چکیده

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and this risk is increased in patients with SLE who may not conform to traditional cardiovascular risk profiles. Aims To determine the prevalence of high CVD risk among patients with SLE calculated using different risk calculators, and to characterise those identified as high risk. Methods A cross-sectional analysis to estimate CVD risk using the Framingham Risk Equation (Framingham score) and an SLE-specific CVD risk equation (SLE score) was undertaken using data from a single centre cohort. The characteristics of patients identified as 'high risk' by the SLE score only (the 'missed group') were compared with those identified by the Framingham score (the 'conventional group'). Results 146 patients were included; 22 (15%) and 44 (30%) were determined to be at 'high risk' based on the Framingham and SLE scores, respectively. Patients in the 'missed group' were less likely to have traditional risk factors and were more likely to be female (81% vs 50%; p=0.03), younger (mean age 54 vs 69 years p<0.01) and have lower systolic blood pressure (132 vs 143 mm Hg; p=0.05). Of those deemed high risk, only a minority were treated to target blood pressure and lipid levels. Conclusions A large proportion of patients with SLE could be re-classified as high risk using a formula that incorporates SLE disease-related parameters. These patients have different profiles to those identified using a conventional risk model. Optimal CVD risk assessment and management warrants further attention in SLE.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Homocysteine and cardiovascular diseases.

To the Editor: Malinow et al,1 in their recent review on homocysteine and cardiovascular diseases, correctly state that based on the available evidence, it is premature to conclude that total homocysteine (tHcy) plasma levels are predictive of the development of cardiovascular events. Their conclusion is mostly based on the analysis of the results of prospective cohort studies of tHcy in cardio...

متن کامل

Addressing modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease in primary care: an evidence-base lost in translation.

BACKGROUND Risk factors for cardiovascular disease can be modified in primary care. Electronic patient record (EPR) systems include embedded cardiovascular risk factor calculators and should facilitate this process. OBJECTIVE To observe how the evidence base for assessing and managing cardiovascular risk is implemented in practice. METHOD We compared the different risk calculators promoted ...

متن کامل

Stroke risk calculators in the era of electronic health records linked to administrative databases.

E lectronic health records (EHRs) linked to administrative databases can unlock the potential of clinical data by overcoming limitations of current cohort-derived risk calculators. EHRs can facilitate implementation of risk-based approaches, whereas current manual or web-based risk calculators pose prohibitive practical barriers to widespread use. We discuss how EHRs can be used: (1) To derive ...

متن کامل

Cardiovascular risk assessment in rheumatoid arthritis – controversies and the new approach

The current methods of cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment in the course of inflammatory connective tissue diseases are a subject of considerable controversy. Comparing different methods of CV risk assessment in current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guidelines, only a few of them recommend the use of formal risk calculators. These are the EULAR guidelines suggesting the use of SCORE and the British...

متن کامل

Agreement among cardiovascular disease risk calculators.

BACKGROUND Use of cardiovascular disease risk calculators is often recommended by guidelines, but research on consistency in risk assessment among calculators is limited. METHOD AND RESULTS A search of PubMed and Google was performed. Five clinicians selected 25 calculators by independent review. Hypothetical patients were created with the use of 7 risk factors (age, sex, smoking, blood press...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017